Opinion
January 17, 1989.
DISCIPLINARY MATTERS
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report recommending that WILLIAM M. ROSENBLATT of CAMDEN, who was admitted to the Bar of this State in 1961, be privately reprimanded for client neglect in violation of DR 6-101(A)(1) and DR 7-101(A)(1) and (2),
And this Court having determined that based on the record and respondent's prior disciplinary history, See In re Rosenblatt, 60 N.J. 505 (1972), public discipline is warranted,
And respondent having, by his counsel, waived oral argument on the issue of public discipline,
And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that WILLIAM M. ROSENBLATT, is publicly reprimanded for his violations of DR 6-101(A)(1) and DR 7-101(A)(1) and (2); and it is further
ORDERED that the Decision and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board, together with this order and the full record of the matter, be added as permanent part of the file of WILLIAM M. ROSENBLATT as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey; and it is further
ORDERED that WILLIAM M. ROSENBLATT reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs.