From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rosenberg v. Ellenville Steam Laundry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 24, 1954
283 App. Div. 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Opinion

April 24, 1954.

Appeal from Workmen's Compensation Board.


Claimant is the mother of the decedent and has received an award of death benefits. The question involved is her dependency. Decedent was twenty-nine years old, unmarried, and lived with both his parents — claimant and his father. He worked about nine months of the year prior to his death. The record strongly indicates that the husband supported claimant. He was earning some $70 a week take-home pay. This was devoted to family purposes. The claimant's testimony of the support furnished her by the deceased is vague and general. She was unable to remember what money her son gave her except that he "always gave me money". During a particular three weeks while she was in Ellenville she said he did "all my shopping and paid for everything" and "has always paid for my food and stuff". This record does not make a fair showing of the extent of her dependency, if any; and certainly it was not a major dependency in view of the support given the claimant by her husband. Award reversed and claim remitted to the Workmen's Compensation Board for its further proceedings, with costs to appellants against the Workmen's Compensation Board. Foster, P.J., Bergan, Coon and Imrie, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Rosenberg v. Ellenville Steam Laundry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 24, 1954
283 App. Div. 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)
Case details for

Matter of Rosenberg v. Ellenville Steam Laundry

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of HELENE ROSENBERG, Respondent, against…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1954

Citations

283 App. Div. 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Citing Cases

Matter of Metros v. King Furniture Co., Inc.

It appears that the only wages received by decedent from this employment were spent for a jacket for himself.…