From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rosado v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 4, 1990
157 A.D.2d 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

January 4, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County.


Petitioner was involved in the takeover of the special housing unit (hereinafter SHU) at Coxsackie Correctional Facility in Greene County on August 1, 1988, which resulted in a misbehavior report charging him with several institutional violations. After a hearing at which he denied the charges, petitioner was found guilty of all charges except assault, based on the misbehavior report and testimony of Correction Sergeant Thomas McKernon. Petitioner appealed and, after respondent's affirmance of the original decision, this CPLR article 78 proceeding was brought.

As a preliminary matter, respondent urges this court to dismiss the petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, arguing that petitioner failed to raise the issue at the administrative appeal level of whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence. Although petitioner's administrative appeal does not specifically raise the issue, our review fundamentally hinges on whether substantial evidence supports respondent's determination (see, Matter of Wanton v Coughlin, 117 A.D.2d 376, 377).

We now confirm. Although sparse, the record sufficiently indicates that Sergeant McKernon, who was assigned to SHU on the day in question, possessed enough firsthand knowledge of petitioner's offenses to enable his misbehavior report and hearing testimony to constitute the substantial evidence needed to uphold respondent's determination (see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130, 139-140). Petitioner does not deny that he was present at SHU at the time of the uprising and offered nothing probative at his hearing to challenge the report or suggest the need for further inquiry by the Hearing Officer (see, supra; see also, Matter of Perez v. Wilmot, 67 N.Y.2d 615, 616-617).

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Rosado v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 4, 1990
157 A.D.2d 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Rosado v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EULISES ROSADO, Petitioner, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN, III…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 4, 1990

Citations

157 A.D.2d 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
550 N.Y.S.2d 168

Citing Cases

Matter of Williams v. Coughlin

We begin with the well-settled proposition that "[a] prison disciplinary determination must be supported by…

Matter of Vitiello v. Coughlin

We now confirm. In two other proceedings arising out of the same incident and based upon the same misbehavior…