From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Rosa v. Britt Fast Freight, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 4, 1999
266 A.D.2d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Decided November 4, 1999

James P. O'Connor, State Insurance Fund (Paul L. Isaacson of counsel), New York City, for appellants.

Morris N. Lissauer, Special Funds Conservation Committee, New York City, for Special Funds Conservation Committee, respondent.

Before: MIKOLL, J.P., MERCURE, YESAWICH JR., PETERS and MUGGLIN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed March 10, 1998, which discharged the Special Disability Fund from liability.

Claimant's husband, a truck driver, sustained a fatal heart attack while making a delivery in the course of his employment. The employer and its workers' compensation carrier contested claimant's claim for death benefits and filed a claim for reimbursement from the Special Disability Fund pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 15 Work. Comp. (8). The Workers' Compensation Board discharged the Fund, concluding that there is a lack of evidence of a preexisting physical impairment which would have been a hindrance to claimant's employment. The employer and carrier appeal.

Where, as here, there is medical evidence of pre-existing heart disease, but there is nothing in the record to establish that decedent's heart disease hindered his job potential in any way, the Board's decision to discharge the Fund must be affirmed (see, Matter of Brigandi v. Town Country Linoleum Carpet, 221 A.D.2d 728). We reject the carrier's contention that because the preexisting condition contributed to decedent's death, it necessarily hindered decedent's job potential. Pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 15 Work. Comp. (8) (e), the Fund could not be liable unless decedent's death "would not have occurred except for such pre-existing permanent physical impairment". Thus, the additional requirement that preexisting impairment hindered job potential (see, Workers' Compensation Law § 15 Work. Comp. [8] [b]; Matter of Sturtevant v. Broome County, 188 A.D.2d 893) requires something more than evidence that the preexisting impairment contributed to decedent's death.

MIKOLL, J.P., MERCURE, YESAWICH JR. and PETERS, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Claim of Rosa v. Britt Fast Freight, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 4, 1999
266 A.D.2d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Claim of Rosa v. Britt Fast Freight, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ANTONIA V. ROSA, Respondent, v. BRITT FAST…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 4, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
698 N.Y.S.2d 65

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Claim of Flynn

In order for an employer to obtain reimbursement from the Fund in the case of a death, it must establish (1)…

Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau v. Crouse-Community Ctr.

In light of the foregoing, and viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-movant, the Court…