From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ronald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1992
188 A.D.2d 1089 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 30, 1992

Present — Callahan, J.P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.


Motion for permission to file late notice of appeal and for other relief denied with leave to renew. Memorandum: The motion papers are insufficient to determine whether the appeal was timely. This Court has discretion to permit late filing if the notice of appeal was timely served (see, CPLR 5520 [a]). It has no authority to extend the time for taking an appeal (see, Matter of Shannon H., 187 A.D.2d 1046). The time to appeal does not begin to run until service of the order appealed from with notice of entry (see, Family Ct Act § 1113). Respondent may renew his application, if necessary, upon a factual showing that the notice was timely served.


Summaries of

Matter of Ronald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1992
188 A.D.2d 1089 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Ronald

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RONALD M., JR., et al

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 1089 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

McRae v. State

However, utilizing the information provided and giving Claimant the benefit of an additional five days for…