Opinion
February 22, 1994
Appeal from the Family Court, Nassau County (Pauline C. Balkin, J.).
Respondent's complaint that the Hearing Examiner "did not give any credence" to the Child Support Standards Act (Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b]) is unavailing since the present action for child support was commenced and resolved before the effective date of that law (September 15, 1989) (see, Pullman v. Pullman, 176 A.D.2d 113, 115). In any event, the record indicates that respondent failed to establish any change in financial circumstances to warrant a modification of his support obligations. An affidavit submitted by a receiver stated that all equitable distribution payment arrears had been met and that respondent henceforth would receive a monthly income from the sale of his business that exceeded the amount received as of the date of the last order issued by the Family Court.
We have considered respondent's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Asch and Tom, JJ.