Opinion
March 22, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County [Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.].
Respondent's determination that petitioner could not have been "ignorant", "unaware", or "oblivious" to "the derogatory aspects of his background" omitted in his personal history questionnaire, namely, his arrest and adjudication as a youthful offender for theft, as well as two license suspensions, a traffic violation and five parking violations resulting in his designation as a scofflaw, and that such omissions are material to his qualifications as a police officer, is supported by substantial evidence, and warrants the termination of his employment (Civil Service Law § 50).
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Wallach, Ross, Asch and Tom, JJ.