From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Roller v. Lehigh Portland Cement

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 22, 1982
89 A.D.2d 1040 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

September 22, 1982


Motion to dismiss appeal granted, without costs. The decision of the board which denied applications to reopen three cases and restored two active cases to the referee calendar is interlocutory in nature and is, therefore, not appealable (Workers' Compensation Law, § 23). Moreover, it is not clear from the board's decision that the parties have been precluded from litigating the issue of the effect of the previous injuries on claimant's over-all disability in the two active cases and, in any event, the decision appealed from may be reviewed on an appeal from a final decision of the board. Kane, J.P., Main, Casey, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Roller v. Lehigh Portland Cement

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 22, 1982
89 A.D.2d 1040 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Matter of Roller v. Lehigh Portland Cement

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ALBERT J. ROLLER, Respondent, v. LEHIGH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 22, 1982

Citations

89 A.D.2d 1040 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Matter of Taylor v. M. Gold and Son, Inc.

The appeal from the remaining Board decision must likewise be dismissed. It is clear from the Board's…

In re Claim of Sawyer

ctions for the expenses deemed "optional/elective" is unsupported by substantial evidence. Inasmuch as the…