From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Roggero v. Frontier Ins. Group

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 21, 1998
250 A.D.2d 1011 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

May 21, 1998

Appeal from the Workers' Compensation Board.


Claimant was employed as an insurance underwriter. It is undisputed that the employer had a strict policy against employees smoking on its premises. On May 31, 1995 while on an unpaid lunch hour, claimant left the employers premises to take a walk and smoke a cigarette. She tripped in a pothole while crossing the public street and fractured her right foot and left wrist. Denied workers compensation benefits on the ground that the accident did not occur in the course of her employment, claimant appeals.

Contrary to claimants contentions, there was sufficient evidence to support the Workers' Compensation Boards conclusion that claimants injury was the result of a personal act and was unrelated to her employment ( see, Johnson v. Sanitary Scale Co., 278 App. Div. 878). It is undisputed that claimant was on her lunch hour at the time the accident occurred. Although claimants accident occurred within close proximity to the employer's premises, injuries sustained on a public street and outside working hours are generally not considered to have occurred in the course of employment ( see, Matter of Jacobs v. Deliwood Foods, 130 A.D.2d 848, 849, lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 608; cf., Matter of Bernard v. Holiday House, 110 A.D.2d 941). Furthermore, the record fails to establish that the risk presented by the pothole was not shared generally by the public ( see generally, Wilson v. Ostergaard, 214 A.D.2d 984; cf., Matter of Husted v. Seneca Steel Serv., 41 N.Y.2d 140; Matter of Lawton v. Eastman Kodak Co., 206 A.D.2d 813). The record supports the finding that claimants anticipated activities of smoking and taking a walk were personal in nature and unconnected with her employment ( see, e.g., Johnson v. Sanitary Scale Co., supra; see also, Matter of Coningsby v. New York State Dept. of Corrections, 245 A.D.2d 1009, 1010). In view of the foregoing, we find no reason to disturb the Boards decision ( see, Matter of Husted v. Seneca Steel Serv., supra; Matter of Jacobs v. Dellwood Foods, supra).

Mikoll, J.P., Crew III, White and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Roggero v. Frontier Ins. Group

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 21, 1998
250 A.D.2d 1011 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Roggero v. Frontier Ins. Group

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of PATRICIA ROGGERO, Appellant, v. FRONTIER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 21, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 1011 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
673 N.Y.S.2d 260

Citing Cases

Matter of Bigley v. J R Music Electronics

For an injury to be compensable under the Workers' Compensation Law, it must have arisen both out of and in…

Claim of Rose v. Verizon N.Y., Inc.

Initially, pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 10(1), an injury is compensable only if it arises out of…