In Rogers v. Cooney, 7 Nev. 213, 216, which was a case similar to this, the court held that it was only necessary 'for the plaintiff to prove a rightful possession in himself.
Summary of this case from Stanley v. Sierra Nevada Silver Mining Co.November, 1930.
Present — Van Kirk, P.J., Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ.
Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.
In Rogers v. Cooney, 7 Nev. 213, 216, which was a case similar to this, the court held that it was only necessary 'for the plaintiff to prove a rightful possession in himself.
Summary of this case from Stanley v. Sierra Nevada Silver Mining Co.Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JAMES ROGERS, Respondent, against FRANK…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Nov 1, 1930
( Lacustrine Fertilizer Co. v. Lake Guano etc. Co., 82 N.Y. 476.) A deposit of tailings becomes an accretion…
Wedekind v. Bell( Cowell v. Lammers, 21 Fed. 203; Atherton v. Fowler, 96 U. S. 513; Hosmer v. Wallace, 97 U. S. 579; Quinby…