Summary
In Matter of Rogalin v. New York City Teachers' Retirement Board, 290 N.Y. 664, 49 N.E.2d 623 (1943), charges were preferred against Rogalin because of his alleged mismanagement of school funds, and he was suspended from his position as a high school principal.
Summary of this case from Winston v. City of New YorkOpinion
Argued January 18, 1943
Decided March 11, 1943
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
William C. Chanler, Corporation Counsel ( Nicholas Bucci and Paxton Blair of counsel), for appellant.
Austin B. Mandel for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, RIPPEY, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ. LEHMAN, Ch. J., FINCH and LEWIS, JJ., dissent on the ground that the filing of charges and suspension from a position in the public service terminates such service conditionally or at least interrupts it and retirement must await restoration to the public service. ( Matter of Eberle v. La Guardia, 285 N.Y. 247.)