From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rodriguez v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 1, 1995
216 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 1, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County.


As the result of a frisk of petitioner and a search of his cell, correction officers found a hollowed-out bone with marihuana residue, 7.8 grams of heroin and $550 in cash. After a hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting the possession of drugs, drug paraphernalia and money. Upon review of the record, we find that substantial evidence supports respondent's determination. Petitioner admitted to possession of drug paraphernalia. However, he failed to adduce proof that the drugs and money were "planted" in his cell. Furthermore, we reject petitioner's claims that he was denied adequate assistance in preparing his defense or that the penalty imposed of 48 months' confinement in special housing and loss of privileges was so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking.

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Rodriguez v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 1, 1995
216 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Rodriguez v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 470

Citing Cases

Moolenaar v. Goord

Petitioner was also charged with, and found not guilty of, possessing a weapon. Initially, petitioner's plea…

In re Coombe

There is, however, no evidence beyond petitioner's assertions that such a conversation took place and, even…