From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Robusto v. Tibbetts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1950
277 App. Div. 1008 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Opinion

October 30, 1950.

Present — Johnston, Acting P.J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.


In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act and section 267 Town of the Town Law to review a determination of the board of appeals of the town of North Salem, order confirming the determination and dismissing the petition unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The approval here in question was not granted on the ground of practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships, and although no other standard has been laid down, by legislation, for the exercise of power purported to be given to the board by the zoning ordinance of the town, we may not pass upon the constitutionality of that portion of the ordinance which purports to grant such power in view of the fact that that objection was not raised at Special Term. ( Matter of Thomas v. Board of Standards Appeals of City of N.Y., 263 App. Div. 352, revd. on other grounds 290 N.Y. 109; Brous v. Town of Hempstead, 272 App. Div. 31.)


Summaries of

Matter of Robusto v. Tibbetts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1950
277 App. Div. 1008 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
Case details for

Matter of Robusto v. Tibbetts

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANNA ROBUSTO, Appellant, against ALBERT B. TIBBETTS et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 30, 1950

Citations

277 App. Div. 1008 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Citing Cases

Matter of Pforzheimer v. Seidman

The constitutionality or legality of the pertinent zoning regulation was not presented by this proceeding to…

Matter of Hofstra Coll. v. Wilmerding

e. Analyzing the others, the court finds them to have been concerned with the jugular nature of the issue ("A…