Opinion
September 14, 1992
Adjudged that the determination is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The determination under review was supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of De Milo v Department of Pub. Safety, 84 A.D.2d 538). Under the circumstances, we do not find the penalty imposed to be so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222; Matter of Alfieri v Murphy, 38 N.Y.2d 976). Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.