From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Robert Oo. v. Dowling

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 4, 1996
87 N.Y.2d 1043 (N.Y. 1996)

Opinion

Decided April 4, 1996

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney-General, Albany (Lew A. Millenbach, Victoria A. Graffeo, Peter H. Schiff and Troy J. Oechsner of counsel), for Michael J. Dowling, appellant-respondent. Kevin L. O'Brien, Albany, and Carolyn Guresz for Ross Prinzo, appellant-respondent.

Roland, Fogel, Koblenz Carr, Albany (Murray S. Carr of counsel), for respondent-appellant.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs (see, Matter of Lee TT. v Dowling, 87 N.Y.2d 699 [decided today]; Matter of Joel P. v Bane, 87 N.Y.2d 699 [decided today]).

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE and CIPARICK.


Summaries of

Matter of Robert Oo. v. Dowling

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 4, 1996
87 N.Y.2d 1043 (N.Y. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Robert Oo. v. Dowling

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT OO., Respondent-Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. DOWLING…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 4, 1996

Citations

87 N.Y.2d 1043 (N.Y. 1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 139
666 N.E.2d 1052

Citing Cases

Matter of Ribya Bb. v. Wing

sufficient substantial evidence to support respondent's determination (see, CPLR 7803). It is well settled…

Matter of Lee Tt. v. Wing

We cannot agree. As a starting point, petitioner's assertion that due process mandates that he be afforded a…