Opinion
February 17, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Following a series of hearings, the Board of Appeals on Zoning of the City of New Rochelle (hereinafter the Board) granted a use variance for the operation of a light manufacturing facility in a commercial zone. Several neighboring property owners then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the Board's action.
Upon our review of the record, we agree with the Supreme Court's determination that the Board's grant of the variance was supported by substantial evidence and was neither arbitrary nor capricious ( see, Matter of Sasso v. Osgood, 86 N.Y.2d 374; Matter of Fuhst v. Foley, 45 N.Y.2d 441; Matter of Turner v. Organ, 240 A.D.2d 507).
The appellants' remaining contention is without merit.
Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Friedmann, JJ., concur.