Opinion
June 3, 1999
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 14, 1998, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Edwin Rivera, New York City, appellant in person.
Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Marjorie S. Leff of counsel), New York City, for respondent.
Before: CARDONA, P.J., MIKOLL, CREW III, SPAIN AND GRAFFEO, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Claimant was employed as a crew leader for a sandwich shop until he was terminated for failing to comply with the employer's cash-handling policies, despite repeated warnings. Upon review of the record, we find substantial evidence to support the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's ruling that claimant lost his employment under disqualifying circumstances. It is well settled that failing to comply with the employer's established policies and procedures and acting in a manner that is detrimental to the employer's interest can be construed as disqualifying misconduct, especially if, as in this case, the conduct persists despite repeated warnings (see, Matter of Depena [Commissioner of Labor], 249 A.D.2d 611, 611-612; Matter of Rothman [Sweeney], 242 A.D.2d 818). Claimant's remaining arguments have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.