From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ringewald v. Struppmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 1961
14 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

July 5, 1961


In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to compel the building inspector and other officials of the Incorporated Village of Upper Brookville, Nassau County, to reissue a building permit, the petitioner appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 3, 1960, upon the decision of the court, dismissing the amended petition after a trial. Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and respondents directed to reissue the building permit after compliance with the following conditions: (1) that petitioner shall have provided adequate access for a width of 15 feet for automobiles and emergency vehicles from Wolver Hollow Road to the proposed structure; (2) that, pursuant to section 239-k Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law, the respondent building inspector shall have forwarded the application for the building permit to the appropriate county authorities for their approval; and (3) that the county authorities shall have approved the application. Findings of fact contained in the decision of the Special Term insofar as they may be inconsistent herewith are reversed, and new findings of fact are made as indicated herein. Petitioner is the owner of a 2 1/2-acre interior parcel of property, located about 1,000 feet west of a county highway known as Wolver Hollow Road. Petitioner also owns a 15-foot wide strip of land which runs from his interior parcel to such county highway and abuts the highway. On May 21, 1959, the building inspector issued a building permit to petitioner to construct a one-family house on his interior parcel. Based on that permit, petitioner let contracts and made other expenditures. On June 23, 1959, the building permit was revoked. It is undisputed that the expenditures made by petitioner on the basis of the May 21, 1959 permit were sufficient to give him a vested right therein if the permit was validly issued. It is also undisputed that the building permit and the application therefore complied in all respects with the requirements of the then local building zone ordinance. If access to the proposed structure is provided from Wolver Hollow Road, there will be compliance with subdivision 2 of section 179-o of the Village Law (cf. Matter of Annandale, Inc., v. Brienza, 1 A.D.2d 785, motion for leave to appeal denied, 2 N.Y.2d 707; Town Law, § 280-a, subds. 1, 5). Under section 239-k Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law, it was the building inspector's duty to forward promptly the application for the building permit to the county authorities for approval. His failure to perform his duty and to forward the application to the county authorities prior to his issuance of the permit on May 21, 1959, should not be allowed to prejudice petitioner's right to the permit. Nolan, P.J., Beldock, Ughetta and Pette, JJ., concur; Brennan, J., concurs in result.


Summaries of

Matter of Ringewald v. Struppmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 1961
14 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

Matter of Ringewald v. Struppmann

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of O. ARTHUR RINGEWALD, Appellant, v. HERBERT C. STRUPPMANN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 5, 1961

Citations

14 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Citing Cases

Matter of Conn. Riv. Estates v. Luchsinger

When respondent's clerk failed to notify the Planning Commission and Public Works of petitioner's application…

Ellington Constr v. Zoning Bd.

Finally, General Municipal Law § 239-k provides that no building permit shall be issued or approved by a…