Opinion
November 28, 1995
Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Sara Schechter, J.).
The eyewitness testimony of two Housing Authority employees that respondent and other youths were jumping on Housing Authority vehicles that were seriously damaged as a result, and attempted to flee when the employees approached, was legally sufficient to support a finding that respondent acted in concert with corespondent and others to intentionally cause damage to the vehicles, the natural consequence of their conduct ( see, Matter of Moises O., 189 A.D.2d 687; People v Quinones, 162 A.D.2d 175, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 863).
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.