From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Richard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 4, 1993
198 A.D.2d 22 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

November 4, 1993

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Bruce M. Kaplan, J.).


Inasmuch as Social Services Law § 384-b (7) (e) (i) specifically provides that evidence of diligent efforts by an agency to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship shall not be required when the parent has failed to apprise the agency of his or her location for a period of six months, it was error for the hearing court to dismiss the petition where petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that, although respondent actually knew that his child, who was born on July 26, 1988, was in foster care, he had no contact with the agency from 1989 when the caseworker brought the child to visit him at Rikers Island until May of 1991 when respondent for the first time finally inquired about his son. The fact that respondent was incarcerated during this period does not relieve him of his obligation to maintain contact with his child which obligation is the same as for any other parent (Matter of Delores B., 141 A.D.2d 100, 105-106, affd 74 N.Y.2d 77).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Richard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 4, 1993
198 A.D.2d 22 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Richard

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BERNARD RICHARD H., an Infant. PIUS XII YOUTH AND FAMILY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 4, 1993

Citations

198 A.D.2d 22 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
603 N.Y.S.2d 129

Citing Cases

Matter of Ariel C

We exercise our discretion to disregard that mistake (see, CPLR 5520 [c]) and deem the appeal to have been…

In re Tiffany A.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger, Wallach, Gonzalez, JJ. Clear and convincing evidence established…