From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rich v. Onondaga Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 7, 1916
112 N.E. 1073 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued February 21, 1916

Decided March 7, 1916

Oliver D. Burden for appellant.

Stewart F. Hancock for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, CARDOZO, SEABURY and POUND, JJ.


Summaries of

Rich v. Onondaga Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 7, 1916
112 N.E. 1073 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Rich v. Onondaga Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of ANNA I. RICH, Respondent, for a…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 7, 1916

Citations

112 N.E. 1073 (N.Y. 1916)
112 N.E. 1073