From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Reynoso v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 14, 1997
241 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

July 14, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court (Ledina, J.).


Petitioner was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting lewd exposure. He commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the administrative determination of guilt on procedural and substantial evidence grounds. In lieu of serving an answer to the petition, respondents moved to dismiss the proceeding in which they refuted petitioner's claims. Supreme Court granted the motion and petitioner appeals.

Respondents should have been afforded an opportunity to serve an answer to the petition with relevant exhibits, including a copy of the transcript of the disciplinary hearing, before Supreme Court addressed the merits of the proceeding. The matter must be remitted to Supreme Court for this purpose (see, Matter of Scott v. Commissioner of Correctional Servs., 194 A.D.2d 1042, 1043).

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, White, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, motion denied and matter remitted to the Supreme Court where respondents will be permitted to serve an answer within 20 days of the date of this Court's decision.


Summaries of

Matter of Reynoso v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 14, 1997
241 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Reynoso v. Coombe

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of IGNACIO REYNOSO, Appellant, v. PHILIP COOMBE, JR., as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 14, 1997

Citations

241 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 1016

Citing Cases

Matter of Cowart v. Selsky

As the Attorney-General concedes, prior to addressing the merits of the proceeding, Supreme Court was…

In the Matter of Taylor v. Katz

With respect to the December 16, 2002 disciplinary determination, however, the Attorney General has advised…