From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Reiss v. Reiss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 28, 1995
221 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 28, 1995

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.).


Respondent's intent to commit harassment in the second degree was properly inferred from the surrounding circumstances ( see, Kellermueller v Port Auth., 201 A.D.2d 427, 429, citing People v Collins, 178 A.D.2d 789), including, in particular, the 44 year old respondent lying on the living room floor of petitioner, his mother, for a day and a half.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Rubin, Kupferman, Asch and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Reiss v. Reiss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 28, 1995
221 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Reiss v. Reiss

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CLARA REISS, Respondent, v. ROBERT REISS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 28, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
221 N.Y.S.2d 467

Citing Cases

Jasna Mina W. v. Waheed S.

The Referee found petitioner's testimony to be credible, and there is no basis in the record to disturb this…

Taveras De C. v. DeJesus C.

Respondent's intent was readily inferable from his conduct and statements during the incident. (see Matter of…