From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Reichel v. Stokol Sales of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 31, 1954
124 N.E.2d 316 (N.Y. 1954)

Opinion

Argued October 20, 1954

Decided December 31, 1954

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Paul F. Donohue for appellants.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( Daniel Polansky, Wendell P. Brown and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LEWIS, Ch. J., CONWAY, DYE and FROESSEL, JJ. DESMOND, FULD and VAN VOORHIS, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim.


Summaries of

Matter of Reichel v. Stokol Sales of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 31, 1954
124 N.E.2d 316 (N.Y. 1954)
Case details for

Matter of Reichel v. Stokol Sales of New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MARGARET REICHEL, Respondent, against STOKOL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 31, 1954

Citations

124 N.E.2d 316 (N.Y. 1954)
124 N.E.2d 316

Citing Cases

Claim of Van De Water v. Emmadine Farms, Inc.

Undoubtedly this record would have sustained a finding by the board that death was due solely to…