From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Regensburg

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 12, 1950
95 N.E.2d 53 (N.Y. 1950)

Opinion

Argued May 25, 1950

Decided October 12, 1950

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, DELEHANTY, S.

Joseph C. Slaughter and Arthur B. Hyman, in person, for Arthur B. Hyman, appellant.

Alfred M. Lindau for Sophy P. Regensburg and another, appellants.

Alexander Ackerson for Catherine E. Piltz, appellant.

James N. Vaughan for executors and trustees, appellants.

Ambrose V. McCall, Otto A. Samuels, Eugene L. Garey and Joseph F. O'Neill for respondent.


Orders of the Appellate Division reversed and decree of Surrogate's Court affirmed, with costs to each appellant appearing separately and filing separate briefs, payable out of the estate, on the ground that the weight of the evidence is in accord with the findings of the Surrogate that the trustees, in terminating the residuary trust, acted in good faith and within the discretionary powers conferred upon them by the will of Carrie Ahrens, deceased. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ. DESMOND, J., dissents on the ground that the weight of the evidence sustains the findings of the Appellate Division.


Summaries of

Matter of Regensburg

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 12, 1950
95 N.E.2d 53 (N.Y. 1950)
Case details for

Matter of Regensburg

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Accounting of MELVILLE E. REGENSBURG et al., as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 12, 1950

Citations

95 N.E.2d 53 (N.Y. 1950)
95 N.E.2d 53

Citing Cases

Matter of Pratt

The failure to require that a citation issue to Mr. Love was a clerical oversight. The doctrine of the "law…

Matter of Mandel

The foregoing evidences an intention that corpus be invaded for the benefit of and use by the widow — as the…