From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Raymond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 1996
224 A.D.2d 337 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 27, 1996

Appeal from the Family Court, Bronx County (Marjory Fields, J.).


As petitioner concedes, in light of the Fourth Department's recent decision in Matter of Christina A. ( 216 A.D.2d 928), the Family Court committed reversible error during the course of the fact-finding hearing by granting petitioner's motion, over respondents' objections, to incorporate the non-hearsay testimony of the witnesses at the Family Court Act § 1028 hearing without first determining that such witnesses were unavailable ( see, CPLR 4517). Since the court based its factual findings solely on this prior testimony, the error cannot be deemed harmless, even though the court permitted the parties to call the witnesses for renewed examination and to present additional evidence and testimony.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ross, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Raymond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 1996
224 A.D.2d 337 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Raymond

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RAYMOND J., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. COMMISSIONER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 337 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 62

Citing Cases

Chloe W. v. Cattaraugus Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs.

The report constitutes hearsay (see Matter of Berrouet v Greaves, 35 AD3d 460, 461) and, contrary to…

Matter of Raymond W

This testimony was uncontroverted and, as Family Court found, adequately explained why respondent was given a…