From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rauch v. Rauch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 3, 1994
201 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 3, 1994

Appeal from the Family Court, Nassau County (Salvatore R. Mosca, J.).


The court rendering an order of child support maintains continuing jurisdiction over any support proceeding brought until the judgment is satisfied (Family Ct Act § 451; Matter of Palmer v. Palmer, 128 A.D.2d 620). Petitioner's initiation of a proceeding in New Jersey under the Uniform Support of Dependents Law (USDL; Domestic Relations Law art 3-A) for enforcement of a New York support order was an additional remedy and did not deprive her of any other available remedy (Domestic Relations Law § 41 [1]; Sharp v. Sharp, 161 A.D.2d 624, lv dismissed 76 N.Y.2d 889). Thus, the Nassau County Family Court did not relinquish jurisdiction as the USDL proceeding and the proceeding appealed from herein could be maintained simultaneously (Matter of Minch v. Minch, 117 A.D.2d 737).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Wallach, Asch and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Rauch v. Rauch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 3, 1994
201 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Rauch v. Rauch

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JUNE RAUCH, Respondent, v. MARK K. RAUCH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 3, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
607 N.Y.S.2d 286

Citing Cases

Spak v. Specht

Respondent's argument that petitioner should have filed a support petition in Pennsylvania pursuant to…

In the Matter of Parenzan

Therefore, UIFSA's continuing, exclusive jurisdiction and controlling order procedures apply to child support…