From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ratz v. Wing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 26, 1997
240 A.D.2d 340 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 26, 1997

Appeal from State Department of Social Services


Respondent's determination that petitioner willfully and without just cause failed to appear for a scheduled Work Experience Program assignment on July 31, 1995 is supported by substantial evidence, including, inter alia, petitioner's own testimony at the fair hearing that he chose to go to an appointment at the District Attorney's Office instead of his work assignment ( see, Matter of Allen v. Dowling, 214 A.D.2d 446). We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Nardelli, Rubin and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

Ratz v. Wing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 26, 1997
240 A.D.2d 340 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Ratz v. Wing

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GENRIKZ RATZ, Petitioner, v. BRIAN J. WING, as Acting…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 26, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 340 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
659 N.Y.S.2d 759