From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ratliff v. Fogg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 8, 1976
54 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

November 8, 1976


In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 inter alia to compel respondents to return certain papers confiscated from petitioner, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated November 20, 1975, which directed that certain papers not be returned to petitioner. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Following a hearing, and an inspection of the papers, it was determined that the papers bore no relationship to a material right of petitioner and that they had the potential for misuse to the detriment of persons named therein. We are in agreement with that determination. Martuscello, Acting P.J., Latham, Cohalan, Damiani and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ratliff v. Fogg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 8, 1976
54 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Ratliff v. Fogg

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SAMUEL RATLIFF, Appellant, v. WALTER FOGG, as Acting…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 8, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)