Opinion
December 19, 1994
Appeal from the Family Court, Queens County (Schindler, J.).
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, we find that reversal was not required based upon the late disclosure of certain Rosario material during his fact-finding hearing. The appellant failed to demonstrate that he was substantially prejudiced by the delayed disclosure (see, People v Banch, 80 N.Y.2d 610, 617; People v Martinez, 71 N.Y.2d 937, 940; People v Hernandez, 195 A.D.2d 573, 574; People v Valentin, 201 A.D.2d 598, 599; People v Robertson, 192 A.D.2d 682; People v Best, 186 A.D.2d 141). Mangano, P.J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.