From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ramos v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 13, 1994
200 A.D.2d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

January 13, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County.


Initially we note that, as petitioner failed to raise at the administrative hearing his contention that the misbehavior report failed to comply with the applicable regulations, it is unpreserved for judicial review. The contention in any event lacks merit. Not only was the regulation that he cites repealed prior to the incident, but the information contained in the misbehavior report is sufficiently specific and detailed so as to comply with current regulations. This same information, which was based on the first-hand observation of a correction officer who testified as to petitioner's involvement in the incident, also satisfies the requirements of substantial evidence. Any remaining contentions raised by petitioner are either unpreserved for our review or without merit.

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Ramos v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 13, 1994
200 A.D.2d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Ramos v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSE RAMOS, Petitioner, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN, III, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 13, 1994

Citations

200 A.D.2d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
606 N.Y.S.2d 804

Citing Cases

In re Victor Patterson

He further contends that the administrative determination is not supported by substantial evidence.…

In re Paul Vasquez

He challenges the administrative determination on the grounds, inter alia, that the misbehavior report failed…