From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ramos v. Alpert

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 1, 1973
300 N.E.2d 158 (N.Y. 1973)

Opinion

Argued June 1, 1973

Decided June 1, 1973

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, EDWARD S. CONWAY, J.

Michael Feit for Jane Ramos and David Sawyer, appellants. Evariste G. Lavigne, Jr. for Daniel O'Connell and others, intervenors-appellants.

John W. Tabner for Joseph C. Frangella, intervenor-appellant.

Condon A. Lyons, County Attorney, for respondents.


On both the main appeal and the cross appeals: Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: We affirm the order of the Appellate Division. Under the uncertainty of the primary procedures and the exigencies of the political calendar, it was appropriate for that court, in the interests of substantial justice, to direct a write-in primary to remedy the concededly late filing of the designating petitions filed with the Board of Elections on May 16.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES and WACHTLER.


When the courts below held that there were 16 vacancies in the designation for Democratic Alderman under section 131 (subd. 7) of the Election Law, the holding of a primary was precluded. The vacancies must be filled by a majority vote of a quorum of the County Committee after primary day. The Appellate Division could not usurp the power of the County Committee. Taking no part: Judge BREITEL.


Summaries of

Matter of Ramos v. Alpert

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 1, 1973
300 N.E.2d 158 (N.Y. 1973)
Case details for

Matter of Ramos v. Alpert

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JANE RAMOS, Individually and on Behalf of All Other…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 1, 1973

Citations

300 N.E.2d 158 (N.Y. 1973)
300 N.E.2d 158
346 N.Y.S.2d 818

Citing Cases

Scoville v. Cicoria

This overstatement does not strictly comply with Election Law § 6-134 (2) and the entire designating petition…

Matter of Oleska v. D'Apice

The court was correct in granting the application for an opportunity to ballot on primary day in the 35th…