From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rafti v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 15, 1964
202 N.E.2d 556 (N.Y. 1964)

Opinion

Argued October 8, 1964

Decided October 15, 1964

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

John F. McDonough for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Julius Fell, Paxton Blair and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

No appearance for claimant-respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD and BURKE. Judges VAN VOORHIS and SCILEPPI dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division. Taking no part: Judge BERGAN.


Summaries of

Matter of Rafti v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 15, 1964
202 N.E.2d 556 (N.Y. 1964)
Case details for

Matter of Rafti v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JOHN RAFTI, Respondent, v. MERRILL LYNCH…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 15, 1964

Citations

202 N.E.2d 556 (N.Y. 1964)
202 N.E.2d 556
254 N.Y.S.2d 109

Citing Cases

Matter of Sillitto v. E.J. Meyer Mem. Hosp

However, this is not the sole test as to whether or not the sport has such a connection with the employment…

Matter of Jablonski v. Gen. Motors Acceptance

The employer had no supervision over the league (it was run by an elected officer), did not contribute to the…