Opinion
March 31, 1952.
Appeal by petitioner from so much of an order as dismisses a writ of habeas corpus, fixes petitioner's rights of visitation of the infant child of the parties, and directs petitioner to pay respondent $100 a month for support of the child as a condition to such right of visitation. Order, insofar as appealed from, modified on the facts by striking from the fourth ordering paragraph the figure "$100" and substituting therefor the figure "$50". As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. There was no basis shown for an increase in the amount of support on which the parties had themselves agreed. As to visitation, there was enough evidence to indicate to the court that the husband had by his own inconsiderate actions forfeited the former slightly more liberal privileges. Appeal by petitioner from order made November 16, 1951, denying his motion to modify the decision of the court, dismissed, without costs. Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ., concur.