From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MATTER OF RABY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1898
29 App. Div. 225 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)

Opinion

May Term, 1898.

Terence J. McManus, for the appellant.

Abram Kling, for the respondent.


This is an application to compel an attorney to pay over money to his client, which it is alleged that he has received. The receipt of the money is admitted, but it is claimed upon the part of the attorney that it has been accounted for. General allegations in regard to such account are indulged in, but nothing in detail is stated, and the attorney might just as well have contented himself with stating that he owed his client nothing as to have made the general allegations contained in his affidavit.

All the circumstances attending the transaction are suspicious, and indicate that the petitioner has been imposed upon. Where an attorney is shown to be in the possession of his client's money, and he is called upon to account, he is bound to show in detail what he has done with the money, and to justify its retention or expenditure. He cannot merely state that he has retained it for counsel fees and for moneys which he has paid out on account of the petitioner.

Upon the present condition of the papers the court would, perhaps, be justified in making an order for the payment of the sums which are claimed to be due the petitioner from this attorney, as he has in no way complied with the obligations resting upon him, in view of the confidential relations existing between himself and his client. The more orderly procedure, however, would seem to be to direct a reference to take proof of the facts alleged in the petition, and to ascertain the precise amount which is due from this attorney to his client, such reference to proceed summarily, to the end that the court may adjudge the payment of that amount.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, so far as to order a reference to take proof of the facts stated in the petition and answer, upon the coming in of which report an application may be made in the court below for a final order.

BARRETT, RUMSEY, INGRAHAM and McLAUGHLIN, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and reference ordered.


Summaries of

MATTER OF RABY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1898
29 App. Div. 225 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)
Case details for

MATTER OF RABY

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of MARY RABY, Appellant, for an Order…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 1898

Citations

29 App. Div. 225 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)
51 N.Y.S. 552

Citing Cases

Pallace v. Niagara, Lockport Ontario Power Co.

An attorney intrusted with the money of his client must be able to furnish an itemized statement of his…

Matter of Martin

Upon this subject the petitioner has not yet had a full hearing, and we think the court ought to have ordered…