From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Quinones v. Process Automation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 16, 1995
221 A.D.2d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 16, 1995

Appeal from the Workers' Compensation Board.


While traveling to work, claimant injured her back when she slipped and fell on ice in a parking lot across from her place of employment. Although claimant's employer sold the subject parking lot prior to claimant's accident and allegedly notified its employees that they could no longer park there, the Board nevertheless concluded that claimant's injury arose out of and in the course of her employment and awarded her workers' compensation benefits. Claimant's employer and its insurance carrier appeal this decision. Inasmuch as the employer failed to persuasively establish that claimant was notified prior to the accident that she should no longer park in the subject parking lot, we do not find that the Board erred in concluding that she suffered a compensable injury. Under the circumstances presented, substantial evidence supports the Board's decision.

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Quinones v. Process Automation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 16, 1995
221 A.D.2d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Quinones v. Process Automation

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of AIDA QUINONES, Respondent, v. PROCESS AUTOMATION et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 425