Opinion
December 23, 1993
Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.
Following an argument between claimant and her supervisor, claimant was suspended for one week. At the hearing, however, claimant admitted that her supervisor told her that he had changed his mind and she should report to work on her next scheduled work day. When she failed to come to work, she was fired. Under the circumstances, substantial evidence exists to support the decision of the Board that claimant's absence from work without permission constituted misconduct and thus disqualifies her from receiving unemployment insurance benefits.
Mikoll, J.P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the decision is affirmed, without costs.