From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Quiles v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 13, 2000
271 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

April 13, 2000.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Lloyd Quiles, Elmira, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Peter G. Crary of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: CARDONA, P.J., CREW III, PETERS, CARPINELLO and MUGGLIN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Following a tier III hearing disposing of two misbehavior reports, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of creating a disturbance, fighting, interfering with an employee, refusing a direct order, two instances of violent conduct and two instances of assault on staff. These charges resulted from an altercation between petitioner and another inmate during which correctional staff was assaulted.

Contrary to petitioner's contention, the two misbehavior reports together with the testimony of various witnesses, including the two correction officers who authored the reports and several inmates who were eyewitnesses to the misconduct, as well as a note in which petitioner admitted to hitting a correction officer in question, were sufficient to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Green v. Selsky, 264 A.D.2d 908, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 757). We also reject petitioner's contention that he was denied the right to call a witness. The Hearing Officer properly refused petitioner's request to call a facility nurse to establish that there were no visible marks on the correction officer's face as a result of the altercation since the Hearing Officer acknowledged this to be the fact, and the degree of injury, if any, is irrelevant to the assault charge. A witness whose testimony would be irrelevant or redundant does not need to be called (see, Matter of Watson v. Goord, 265 A.D.2d 700, 696 N.Y.S.2d 586; Matter of Covington v. Goord, 262 A.D.2d 803).

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Quiles v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 13, 2000
271 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Quiles v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LLOYD QUILES, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 13, 2000

Citations

271 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
707 N.Y.S.2d 256

Citing Cases

Orr v. Selsky

ng officer and by the officer who was present when the incident occurred (see, Matter of Cornwall v. Goord,…

Ng v. Goord

Despite orders to do so, petitioner refused to put his hands back in his pockets, at which point physical…