From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Quackenbush v. H.M. Quackenbush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 16, 1995
212 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 16, 1995

Appeal from the Workers' Compensation Board.


The Board found that there was insufficient evidence in the record to establish that decedent was involved in a dual purpose trip, that is one involving both personal and business matters, at the time of his accident. It therefore ruled that the accident did not arise out of and was not in the course of decedent's employment. Insofar as there is substantial evidence supporting the Board's decision, it must be upheld.

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Quackenbush v. H.M. Quackenbush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 16, 1995
212 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Quackenbush v. H.M. Quackenbush

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of TERESA QUACKENBUSH, Appellant, v. H.M…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 16, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
623 N.Y.S.2d 177