From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Quackenbush v. Hellinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 15, 1994
203 A.D.2d 972 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 15, 1994

Present — Pine, J.P., Balio, Lawton, Fallon and Doerr, JJ. (Filed Mar. 31, 1994.)


Motion granted and order of Oswego County Family Court summarily reversed and matter remitted to Oswego County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order of the Ontario County Family Court denying objections to the order of a Hearing Examiner. He has submitted uncontroverted proof that seven of eight tape recordings of proceedings before the Hearing Examiner are of such poor quality that they are not transcribable. The missing dates appear to include all of the testimony. The single transcript provided is insufficient for meaningful appellate review and reversal is required. Family Court should vacate the order of the Hearing Examiner and order a de novo hearing.


Summaries of

Matter of Quackenbush v. Hellinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 15, 1994
203 A.D.2d 972 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Quackenbush v. Hellinger

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LEOLLIA QUACKENBUSH, Respondent, v. RAYMOND HELLINGER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 15, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 972 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 335

Citing Cases

Matter of Sledge v. Sledge

te to meet the child's present needs ( Matter of Brescia v. Fitts, 56 N.Y.2d 132), and, except for a minor…