Opinion
September 22, 1955.
This application for an order in the nature of prohibition is denied, without costs and without prejudice on the ground that it has not been shown conclusively that the Special Term sought to be enjoined is about to act in excess of its jurisdiction. However, the questions in the proceeding now pending under the Election Law should be heard and determined in Rensselaer County where the venue of the proceeding is laid in view of the fact that a term of the Supreme Court is now in session there before which the issues can be presented. Foster, P.J., Bergan, Halpern and Zeller, JJ., concur.