From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Pungello v. N.Y. City Hous. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 12, 1992
181 A.D.2d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 12, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.).


General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) specifically provides that in determining whether to permit service of a late notice of claim, the court shall consider "excusable error concerning the identity of the public corporation against which the claim should be asserted". Recently, this court found excusable error where the claimant's counsel, based on information in the warrants of arrest, failed to discover that Housing Authority police were involved in the arrest (Matter of Copeland v New York City Hous. Auth., 173 A.D.2d 335). Here, where claimant was allegedly shot by an off-duty Housing Authority detective, the five month delay in serving a notice of claim on the Authority was properly excused in view of counsel's good faith belief that the detective was employed by the City of New York, the lack of prejudice to defendant, and defendant's receipt of contemporaneous reports of the incident.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Ross, Asch and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Pungello v. N.Y. City Hous. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 12, 1992
181 A.D.2d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Pungello v. N.Y. City Hous. Auth

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH PUNGELLO, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 12, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
580 N.Y.S.2d 359