Opinion
December 23, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We disagree with the appellant's contention that the court's determination was against the weight of the evidence. The court properly credited the testimony of the investigating police officer who testified that shortly after the accident the appellant stated that there had been no physical contact between his car and another car prior to his collision with a telephone pole (see generally, Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493, 498; see also, Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Tauszik, 177 A.D.2d 486).
We have examined the appellant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J.P., Lawrence, Rosenblatt and O'Brien, JJ., concur.