From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Prudential Prop. Cas. v. Rothman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 1986
116 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

January 21, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burstein, J.).


Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and appellant's motion granted on condition that it pay counsel for petitioner Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company the sum of $500 within 10 days of service upon it of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. In the event said condition is not complied with, order affirmed, with costs.

Appellant has proffered a meritorious defense (see, Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. [Ramos — Eveready Ins. Co.], 104 A.D.2d 495). Although it has not satisfactorily justified its failure to contact opposing counsel for an adjournment pending receipt of certain papers, the delay was relatively minimal (one month) and no prejudice appears to have occurred. Hence, appellant's default should have been conditionally vacated. Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Prudential Prop. Cas. v. Rothman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 1986
116 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Matter of Prudential Prop. Cas. v. Rothman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 21, 1986

Citations

116 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Progressive v. Cynthia

On April 22, 2005 a car owned by the respondent Cynthia Jackson and insured by the petitioner Progressive…

Ponemon v. Loan

In our view, Supreme Court properly denied defendants' motion to compel acceptance of the answer. Although we…