From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Proverb v. Niesley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 1969
32 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Summary

In Proverb the petitioner sought to have the Nassau County Civil Service Commission review disciplinary action taken against him.

Summary of this case from Matter of Bianca v. Frank

Opinion

May 19, 1969


In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to direct respondents to entertain petitioner's appeal from a determination of the Nassau County Acting Police Commissioner, disciplining petitioner for violation of departmental regulations, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 15, 1965, which dismissed the petition. Judgment reversed, on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and respondents are directed to hear and determine petitioner's appeal from the determination of the Acting Commissioner on the merits. Petitioner had the right to elect to appeal to respondents (Civil Service Law, §§ 76, 2). The reference in subdivision d of section 8-13.0 of the Nassau County Administrative Code (L. 1939, chs. 272, 701-709, as amd. by L. 1948, ch. 436) to "A petition to review a determination" does not constitute a limitation to a proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR. Christ, Acting P.J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Proverb v. Niesley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 1969
32 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

In Proverb the petitioner sought to have the Nassau County Civil Service Commission review disciplinary action taken against him.

Summary of this case from Matter of Bianca v. Frank
Case details for

Matter of Proverb v. Niesley

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RICHARD V. PROVERB, Appellant, v. JOHN R. NIESLEY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 19, 1969

Citations

32 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
300 N.Y.S.2d 780

Citing Cases

Matter of Bianca v. Frank

Respondents cross-moved to dismiss the proceeding as being time-barred under subdivision d of section 8-13.0…

Matter of Smith v. Hoyt

The collective bargaining agreement itself allows the appellant to choose between administrative review and…