From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Porteck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 3, 1963
19 A.D.2d 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

October 3, 1963


Order, entered on October 24, 1962, denying respondent-appellant's motion to stay arbitration, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant; the matter is remanded for a hearing upon the issues of coverage raised by respondent-appellant; and arbitration is stayed pending determination of such issues. As petitioner-respondent's notice of intention to arbitrate fails to meet the requirements of subdivision 2 of section 1458 of the Civil Practice Act, the 10-day limitation period therein provided is inapplicable ( Matter of Double E Food Markets v. Beatson, 18 A.D.2d 976; and, see, CPLR, § 7503, subd. [c]).

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Steuer, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Porteck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 3, 1963
19 A.D.2d 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Matter of Porteck

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Arbitration between MILDRED PORTECK, Respondent, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 3, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

Matter of Passik

Section 600 Ins. of the Insurance Law states the purpose of the act is to secure recompense to innocent…

Matter of Motor Vehicle Acc. Indemnification Corp.

The statute (CPLR 7503, subd. [c]) and the cases, say that the notice of intention to arbitrate must contain…