Opinion
April 29, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Under the circumstances of this case, we find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the petitioner's application to file a late notice of claim (see, Matter of Mazzilli v. City of New York, 115 A.D.2d 604). Mangano, P.J., Brown, Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.