From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plainview-Old Bethpage Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 30, 1984
63 N.Y.2d 921 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Decided October 30, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Leo F. McGinity, J.

Gregory J. Guercio and Joseph W. Campanella for appellants.

Stanley A. Immerman and Robert D. Clearfield for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Measurement of the 30 to 90 days time period within which payroll deductions may be taken does not commence until the employees concerned have been notified individually of the determination that they have committed a violation. ( Matter of King v Carey, 57 N.Y.2d 505, 514; Civil Service Law, § 210, subd 2, pars [d], [e], [f].) The decision in Matter of De Lury v Beame ( 49 N.Y.2d 155) is not to be construed inconsistently with this statutory requirement.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Plainview-Old Bethpage Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 30, 1984
63 N.Y.2d 921 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Plainview-Old Bethpage Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PLAINVIEW-OLD BETHPAGE CONGRESS OF TEACHERS et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 30, 1984

Citations

63 N.Y.2d 921 (N.Y. 1984)
483 N.Y.S.2d 677
473 N.E.2d 29