From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Pincus v. Hults

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 25, 1962
181 N.E.2d 218 (N.Y. 1962)

Opinion

Argued January 11, 1962

Decided January 25, 1962

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Paxton Blair of counsel), for appellant.

Solomon Z. Ferziger and Bernard Meyerson for respondent.


Order reversed and determination of the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles reinstated, upon the ground that there is substantial evidence to support the Commissioner's finding of gross negligence in the operation of a motor vehicle. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER. Judge FROESSEL dissents and votes to affirm in the following memorandum: I agree with the Appellate Division that upon this record there is no substantial evidence that respondent was operating his automobile "in a manner showing a reckless disregard for life or property of others", a necessary basis for a finding of gross negligence (Vehicle and Traffic Law, former § 71, subd. 3, par. [e]).


Summaries of

Matter of Pincus v. Hults

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 25, 1962
181 N.E.2d 218 (N.Y. 1962)
Case details for

Matter of Pincus v. Hults

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EDWARD K. PINCUS, Respondent, v. WILLIAM S. HULTS, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 25, 1962

Citations

181 N.E.2d 218 (N.Y. 1962)
181 N.E.2d 218
225 N.Y.S.2d 963

Citing Cases

Matter of Iovino v. Hults

" The finding by the Referee that the petitioner "was grossly negligent in failing to grant the right of way…