From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Pietranico v. Ambach

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 19, 1982
55 N.Y.2d 861 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided January 19, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Margaret K. Brooks and Paul N. Samuels for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( Raymond J. Foley of counsel), for respondents.


On summary consideration, judgment affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice LEONARD A. WEISS at the Appellate Division ( 82 A.D.2d 625), based on the bare record before us.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES and WACHTLER. Judges FUCHSBERG and MEYER dissent in part and vote to modify by reducing the punishment imposed to censure for the reasons stated in the concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion by former Justice J. CLARENCE HERLIHY at the Appellate Division ( 82 A.D.2d 625, 627-628).


Summaries of

Matter of Pietranico v. Ambach

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 19, 1982
55 N.Y.2d 861 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Matter of Pietranico v. Ambach

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ARLINE PIETRANICO, Appellant, v. GORDON M. AMBACH, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 19, 1982

Citations

55 N.Y.2d 861 (N.Y. 1982)
447 N.Y.S.2d 924
432 N.E.2d 796

Citing Cases

Ogundu v. State

rcumstances underlying" the criminal convictions, she was not entitled to an interview as a matter of due…

Matter of Ward v. Ambach

Upon our review of the record, we do not find the suspension either shocking to our sense of fairness or…